Followers Build Leaders
The definition of a leader is someone who others follow. This definition is the opposite of where most would start. It puts the emphasis on the followers not on the leader. It means that a group of people collectively decide to back an individual. Their choice determines the person in front. If I decide to lead but no one follows, does that make me a leader? I argue that followers create leaders and not the other way around.
Often times when discussing the topic of "leadership" we put the emphasis on the qualities of leader. Especially when these leaders are larger than life. Many times we internalize this in our own quest to be out front, lead and gain notoriety. When we think of great leaders we think of the brave (George Washington), the bold (Jack Welch), the inspirational (Steve Jobs) or even the audacious and reckless (Trump). We look to people with accolades, degrees, job titles, big bank accounts, business accomplishments and try model ourselves after them in order to get to where they got. There is nothing wrong with modeling, as long you're aware of who, why and what attributes you're looking to model. But what is missing from the equation is looking at the masses that propelled great leaders. What is it that they were seeking? What promises were they given? What were their dreams and aspirations?
If you are looking to lead, you must first find out what it is that your followers want for themselves. Once you figure this out you must then be the bold, brave, courageous, inspirational and fearless leader that gets your followers to the promise land. Always remember who it is that you serve. Step into leadership with the spirit of servitude. Deliver on your promises and you will find loyalty.